Saturday, May 24, 2008
Calories In Toothpaste
"After that I continued - compare our nature about their education and their lack of education with an experience like this. Represent men in an underground dwelling in a cave, which is open entry, in its entirety in the light. It children are from the legs andneck chains, so they must stay there and watch just before them, because the chains prevent them from turning
around the head. Above and beyond is a fire l light that shines behind them, and between the fire and the prisoners there is a wall built side by side as the screen before the puppeteers
up for public display, above the screen, the puppets. "I can imagine. - Imagine now that, on the other side of the septum, leading
shadows pass all manner of vessels and figurines of humans and other animals, made of wood and stone
of various kinds, and among those who spend a talk and
other silent. Strange comparison
-do,and strange are these prisoners.
"But they're just like us. Well first, do you think you have seen other
themselves or each other, nothing but the shadows cast by the fire
part of the cave they have against it?
"Of course not, if all their life are forced not to move the heads.
- And is not the case with objects that carry the passing of another of
septum?
"Undoubtedly.
"Then, if dialogue between them, do not you think they would understand to be
naming the objects that pass by and they see?
-necessarily.
"And if the detention is counted with an echo from the wall they have against each other, and
one of those passing across the septum to speak,"
not think believe that what they hear comes from the shadow that passes in front of them?
- By Jove, yes!
- And that the real prisoners should not have anything but the shadows of artificial objects transported
?
- it's every need.
- Examine now the case of a release from his chains and
cure your ignorance, what if this happen to them naturally:
one of them was released and forced to stand up suddenly, back neck and go looking
light and, in doing all this suffering and because of the glare
was unable to perceive those things whose shadows had
seen before. What do you think would respond if you say that whatI'm the light of the stars and the moon more easily than,
during the day, the sun and sunlight.
"No doubt.
- Finally, I could feel the sun, not in images
water or other places that are strange, but contemplate how it is in and of itself, in its own area
.
-necessarily.
-After which would conclude, with respect to the sun, which is what causes the seasons and years
that governs everything in the visible area and that in some way
is because of things they had seen.
- It is clear that after all this, would arrive at such conclusions.
- And if you remember your first home, the type of existing knowledge there and then compared their
Homer, and "I'd rather be a farmer
was a poor man's servant" or bear anything rather than return to their previous
mode and say that life?
- So I also think that would suffer anything rather than endure this
life.
- think now this: if you come down again and take his own seat, "
not have eyes dimmed by darkness, the sun suddenly arrive?
- No doubt.
- And if I were to discriminate against those shadows back in
tough competition with those who have kept the chains at all times, confusingly
and see until your eyes are rearranged in this state and at one time accustomed
nothing short would not be exposed
ridicule because it was said that, having risen to the top, had broken the
eyes, and not even worth intentions go up? And if
tried to untie them and bring them to light, do not you kill, if they could
it in their hands and kill him?
- Sure.
- Well, my dear Glaucon, we have fully implemented this
elegoría to what has previously been said, comparing the region who is manifested through
of sight with the house-prison, and light the fire that she has in
power of the sun, compares, on the other hand, contemplating the rise and
things up with the path of the soul to the intelligible level and not go wrong in how
Thursday, May 22, 2008
What Do The Colours Stand For On Shag Bands Where we are headed.
"The only constant is the idiot, because he knows that it is" Oscar Wilde
The first condition for a decline is that most,
comfortable selfish people, those who never do anything for
all, these, firmly believe that there is a decline in
society, indeed, believe that they are 'the best of possible worlds',
as Voltaire would say the talk of 'Candide'. The second condition is
people occupying higher positions, leadersRLO. So the declines are
always a cavalcade of fools led by evil ....
all ran happily toward disaster, some through stupidity and
comfort, and others for selfish ambition of the present and future
contempt. Some believe that 'and fix it' and other 'after me the deluge
. "
Church rots in decline while the faithful go to church as if nothing happened
bishops and covenant and eat at the same table in
Masons and secularists who dig the ruin of religion.
That infernal pact between the masses and the evil is the sign of the times
, has always been. Therefore
combating decadence is always a battle against
the sign of timelturales ... "
" The Darkness of the West ", Vicente Risco
disease to detect decay there's nothing better than
analyze what state is the Grand Style, that is how he sees the company
style acts worthy, unique facts of heroism or sacrifice
, acts which show a deep human integrity, a lofty and elegant
sensitivity, a high regard for the human,
where the behavior becomes extremely honorable, that Great
distinguishes Style human quality. See where Art is sensitive, where the generosity
flowers and response to rudeness is the
dignity.
In the society called 'Western' current best commercial and would call
siouda unpaid, no noble behavior
albeit at the expense of losing positions or perks, there is already high, but rebels
softly. So now when someone says he is a rebel
usually means that it is even more repulsive, with tastes nasty and under what society accepts, is the rebellion at low. The rebel who claims to be transsexual, drug addict or supporter
the most complete debauchery. What is missing is the Rebel before,
it was because he considered vile and debased society and rebellion was
against social misery that tell against a
bizarre behavior by the noble and radical. Quevedo or
Drieu la Rochelle, to name two examples, UnamunoBureaucratism XC social, as they dry the hearts and minds
constrict, as you lose the sensitivity to the great ideas and great passions
. Philistinism, cowardice, dishonesty and will
, bad conscience, have taken over all souls and spirits
few vigorous hampered by the hostility of the environment.
The European is a miserable man physically and spiritually,
degenerated into civil life, like animals degenerate
domesticity.
So life has diminished, it has become petty and cowardly, hypocritical
, sly, not ideal. So the general tone of European civilization is the baseness
. "
This descRisco ripción is accurate, many years ago, and certainly if he had known
today's world do not even have bothered to criticize
therefore could not conceive
degree of degradation to which we have now.
Recently a Swiss court has convicted the leader of the animal protection association
Erwin Kessler for 'racial discrimination' to condemn the ritual murder
animals against Jews and Muslims.
Kessler is one of those individuals isolated and anonymous, but never shown
convictions, who puts
compassion for animals, her love for him with dignity, comfort or interest ... and although
his intention was only to save some poor animal deaths
assume power in political time, rather than engage in
their duty, to provide guidance on the values that society should follow.
In NS there is a deep spiritual mystic, a clear vision of the supremacy
values against the interest, and with it the intention of using public forms
honor those values. So the ceremonies for the fallen
, nightly torch parades, parties
in crop farming, the simple folk religious ceremonies, everything was
supported and promoted by the NS as a way to remember
'religiously' (in the broad sense the word 'religion') the values that underpin
each of these ceremonies: The Honor of
who sacrifice for the icommon interest measure, community spirit (
racial if you want to use that word), the beauty of life in nature, the dignity of work
to money, the Christian love of neighbor, ect .... Recently
Tahar Ben Jelloun, Zionist Jew and as such miserable
rewarded by the system, calls out the possibility that
Muslim women wear the headscarf in French schools.
speaks of secularism as the best democratic solution. Of course not
criticizes Israel, confessional state where it exists, the power of the rabbis there,
Jewish bonnet use, etc ...
Our view is quite the opposite, even in Europe is positive
immigrants (while failure to achieve reintegration into their pu
eblos of origin) carry all types of identity that
grouped into communities of their own. Secularism is an attack on the identity and a more equal
globalizing the system.
The system has as its primary enemy, the Grand Style, Values
or sublime. And second, the spirituality that is the external view and
ritual of these values.
at the forefront of 24 -6 to 03 is exposed as the European Constitution that seeks to impose
international usury
trying to appoint as bases of the origins of the Masons Europe (called 'lights'), but avoiding any
reference to Christianity.
Marxism is identified in 'lights' as scientific materialism is c
more in 'person', have no values, they lack the higher is filled with lower, with the selfishness utility. and the tool is based on a particular philosophy:
scientistic materialism.
"In the eighteenth century, La Mettrie, Helvetius, D'Holbach and the Encyclopedia
want the clear and distinct knowledge, ie science,
enough for the perfection of humanity. Science pursues the unattainable identity
of thought and being:
wants to be the absolute knowledge of the nature of things, namely the belief
opposite tries to explain the world and man. In the golden age of Positivism
was thought possible: the learned were applied to reduce the facts
Spiritual to biological facts, facts to facts
biological physical-chemical and physico-chemical facts to
mechanical facts, it was the triumph of mechanism, initiated by
Pythagoras. They wanted to scientifically explain society, religion, art
, genius, crime ... Science was to give reality as
is ... "('The darkness of the West', Vicente Risco).
Science can not explain the Man, the only full trauma, society
Zoo becomes a neurotic, decadent and corrupt
without values, after the Golden Utility. And in that state
Work stops being a quality community partnerships to keep
to be just the pursuit of greed. C lost their sense sacred and honorable. Soldiers become mercenaries and people just struggling to
salaries. Mercenaries, mercenary violence, professional,
may be even more brutal but no longer has the mythic base
honorable.
The decline is always shown by the desecration of the defense
, cowardice and fear to defend the honor, and finally the sentence
defense, which is the current stage: defense is a crime often and always
something 'not well seen. " Are prohibited
defend the people, even against drug dealers or thugs
groups, and any outbreak of dignity and defense is an intolerance or an attitude
'undemocratic'.decay of schools and countless trends,
proof that our time can not find your formula
artistic expression.
observation Clarity Pio Baroja,
is equal signs in the field of ethics.
is, the underlying problem in the decline is the lack of values, and art
this is reflected in the inability to conceive a real art, by
therefore must take a direction to replace something
values possible in mental state: originality, change, gender, income
, ect ....
decadent art has always been one that has replaced that
'mystical conception' or 'spiritual' true art behind the
circus, the, showor, the show of extravagance.
Because contrary to what one might think the danger is not in the art of Jewish-Zionist
poses a black box and white or
racist ideas or support to the political thesis of the system, it is nothing but propaganda
. No, the bad, the real decadent art, is in the
extravagance, is the belief that what is original is
winning because we're in a circus and fun is the reason for the art-trash
today.
Dongle Emulator Cubase Sx2
In the belief that you can leave and life, do, say and think every one of the things in line with this idea. Away as men, if God exists at all is frightening, because they could not sumirte in evil. But if you really do not exist or do not care about human affairs, why live in a world void of gods or Providence vacuum? But yes, and they care about human affairs, and have taken all necessaryits power to that man does not succumb to the real evils. And if a bad stay, it also would have expected, in order to tell the man with all means to avoid falling into it. But what does a man worse, how it could make life worse? Or through ignorance or deliberately, but for failing to prevent or correct these defects, the nature of the group would have consented. And no disability or inability to have committed an error of such dimensions as to touch them the good and evil alike, good and evil in equal measure. However, death and life, glory and shame, pain and pleasure, wealth and hardship, all that happens either man good and bad, for it is neither beautiful nor ugly. Because. But death is not only the action of nature, but also useful action to nature. How man comes into contact with God and how much of himself, and, in short, how prepared this small part of man.
13. Nothing is more wretched than the man walking in circles and everything "that explores" he says, "the depths of the earth", and seeks by conjecture what is happening in the soul of the neighbor, but not realizing you just be with the only divinity that resides within them, and be sincere server. And the cult that is owed is to preserve pure passion, thoughtlessness and anger against what comes from gods and men. For whatcoming from the gods are respected for their excellence, but what comes from men is dear to our relationship, and sometimes even somewhat inspired by compassion for their ignorance of the goods and evils, no blindness less than that deprives us to discern black from white.
14. Although shouldst live three thousand years and as many times ten thousand, however remember that no one loses another life you live, or live other than the loss. Consequently, the longest and shortest converge in one spot. This, in effect, is equal for all, what is lost is also the same, and what separates them is obviously just a moment. Then either the past or the future couldaide reason and the law of the city and most venerable constitution.
17. time of life, a point, its substance, flowing, his sensation, cloudy, and the composition of the whole body, easily corruptible, his soul, a top, your fortune, something difficult to guess, his fame, indecipherable. In short: everything that belongs to the body, a river dream and vapor, which is proper to the soul, life, war and stay in a foreign land, posthumous fame, forgotten. What then, can give us company? Philosophy exclusively. And this is to preserve the inner guidance, free of insults and injury, the owner of pleasures and pains, if not do anything randomly, without the use of lies and the hipocresía, regardless of what else to do or not do, indeed, accepting what happens and is assigned as coming from that place where he has been. And above all, waiting to die with positive thinking, in the belief that this is not anything other than dissolution of elements which make up each living being. And if for the same elements is nothing scary in the fact that everyone is continually transformed into another, why fear the transformation and dissolution of all things? As this is according to nature, and nothing is wrong when it conforms to nature. In Carnunto
Saturday, May 3, 2008
Rocklin, Ca. Singles.com
IDEAS AND BELIEFS
José Ortega y Gasset
& nbsp;
BELIEVE AND THINK I
has ideas, in belief is. - "Thinking about things" and "have them."
When you want to understand a ho's name, the life of a man, try first of all find out their ideas. Since the EU believes it has "historical sense", this is the most basic requirement. How can they influence the existence of an individual with his ideas and the ideas of his time? The thing is obvious. Perfectly, but the thing is also quite misleading, and in my home, insufficient clarity about what you are looking for when they inquire the ideas of a man or a time-prevents get clarity on your life, its history .
The term "ideas of a man" can refer to different things. For example, the thoughts that occur to her about this or that, and those that happen to others and he repeated and adopted. These may be poseer the different degrees of truth. They can even be "scientific truths." Such differences, however, do not matter much, if anything important, given the much more radical question now raised. Because they are. vulgar thoughts, be rigorous "scientific theories", we always try to occurrences that arise in a man, his original or insufflator for others. But this obviously implies that the man was already there before it occurs or adopt the idea. This stems, in one way or another, within a life that pre-existed it. However, no human life is certainly not constituted by certain basic beliefs and, as it were mounted on them. Living is having to deal with something, with the world and himself. But it isro and until we are able to die for them. What we can not is ... live on them. They are the work we do and, therefore, pose and our life, which is based on ideas, beliefs that do not produce us, that, in general, we do not even formulate and, of course, do not discuss or argue or propagate. With the beliefs themselves do nothing, but we're just there. Precisely what happens to us not ever, if we speak with our carefully-occurrences. Vulgar language accurately invented the expression "being in the belief." Indeed, the belief is, and occurrence have and hold. But the belief is the one for us and sustains us.
So there ideas that we call them-so hapormulate.
This shows, without more, that everything in which we think is ipso facto a reality problem for us in our lives and occupies second place when compared with our true beliefs. These do not think now or later: our relationship with them is much more efficient, is ... have them always, without pause.
I think of its importance to inject, at last, clearly in the structure of human life this contrast between thinking something and have it. Intellectualism that has bullied, almost without interruption, the entire past of philosophy has prevented us to make patent and has invested the respective value of both terms. I explicar.
Analyze your behavior any reader, even the simplest in appearance. The reader is at home and for some other reasons, decides to go out. What is all this the proper behavior that has the character of thought, even understanding the word in its broadest sense, ie, as consciousness of something clear and present? The reader has realized its reasons, the decision, the execution of the movements with which he walked, opened the door, down the stairs. All this in the most favorable. However, even in that case and much to look at his conscience will not find in it any thought that stating that there street. The reader has no question for a momentfor if there is not the Why? Not be denied that to be resolved out on the street is of some importance that the street exists. In fact, is the most important of all, the course of everything else. However, precisely for that important subject matter is not the reader has not thought about it or to deny or to affirm or to question it. Does this mean that the existence or nonexistence of the street does not influence their behavior? Obviously not. The test would have if getting to the door of his home discovered that the street had disappeared, the land ended in the doorway of his home or talk to E1 opened a chasm. Then he would produce in the reader's consciousness a very clear and violent surprise. What?apart. He was in us, but not consciously, but as latent involvement of our consciousness or thought. However, this mode of intervention is something in our life without the thought to call "count on it." And that is so characteristic of our actual beliefs.
intellectualism, I said, inverts the value of terms. Now it is clear the meaning of this charge. In fact, intellectualism tended to regard as the most efficient in our life as conscious. Now we see that the opposite is true. Maximum efficiency on our behavior lies in the latent implications of our intellectual activity, in everything we have, and that, in pure count on it, not think.
S "this, man has clearly aware that his intellect is exercised only on questionable matters, that the truth of ideas is powered by your question. So, is this true in the test that we intend to give it. The idea needs the critics as the lungs of oxygen and held and said drawing on other ideas which, in turn, ride on another, forming a whole or system. Arman, thus a world apart from the real world, a world composed exclusively of ideas that the man known manufacturer and responsible. So that the strength of the strongest idea is reduced to the enduring strength to be referred to all other ideas. Nothing less, but nothing more. What can not is to test an idea, like a coin, golpeándoessence or relative knowledge.
A study like this would allow us to see clearly the change is sustained by our faith in reason over the last twenty years, and this amazing shed light on almost all the strange things that happen in our time.
But now I needed nothing but make the reader fall into the account of what our relationship with ideas, with the intellectual world. This relationship is not of faith in them: things that our thoughts, theories offer us, we are not reality, but precisely and only ... ideas.
But while the reader will not understand what something is us when we only idea, not reality, if not ask him to fix in their attitude towardswhat is called "fancies, imaginations." But the world of fantasy, imagination, is poetry. Well, I'm not daunted, by contrast, this was getting at. To be well over what we are the ideas, their primary role in life, you must have the courage to bring science to poetry much more than has hitherto been bold. I would say, if after all I want to set a good understanding that science is much closer to poetry than reality, that its role in the body of our life is much like that of art. No doubt, compared with a novel, science seems to be the reality itself. But compared to the true reality is what science says is a novel, fantasy, construction menta, for some or other reasons, the belief persists. Specify the major lines of radical change in the shape of human life that result in disappearance, was a great exercise as an introduction to historical thinking.)
But in this core area of our beliefs are open, here and there, such as manholes, huge holes in doubt. This is the time to say that doubt, the real, which is not merely methodological or intellectual, is a way of belief and belonging to the same stratum as profitability in the architecture of life. Also in doubt is. Only in this case the room has a terrible temper. Is in doubt as it is in an abyss, ie falling. It is therefore the negation of stability. Suddenly satimos that fails under our feet firmly ground and we feel down, down in a vacuum, unable to avail ourselves, unable to do anything to affirm, to live. Is like death in life, such as attending to the cancellation of our own existence. However, the question of belief retains the character of being something that is, that is, we do not do or put us. There is an idea we could think or not, support, criticize, make, but, at all, we are. Not deemed as a paradox, but consider it very difficult to describe what is the real question if not say that we believe our doubts.
If not, if you doubt our doubts, it would be harmless. The terrible thing is that it acts in our lives exactly the samebear, but we doubt it casts doubt before, to a reality as reality as grounded in the belief, but is it ambiguous, double-headed, unstable, against which we do not know what to expect or what to do. The question, in short, is to be in unstable as such: it is life at the moment the earthquake, an earthquake permanent and definitive.
At this point, as in many other references to human life, we receive further clarification of the vulgar language of scientific thought. Thinkers, oddly enough, have always jumped to the reality that radical bullfighter, have left behind him. Instead, the man thinker, more attentive to what matters, has taken sharp eye on their own existence and has made the language, seeNácul precipitate these entrevisiones.
forget too that the language is now thought, doctrine. When used as a tool for ideological combinations more complicated, we take seriously the primary ideology he expressed that he is. When, by chance, we are unconcerned about what we mean us through the twists language presets and pay attention to what they tell us on their own, surprising his sharpness, his insightful discovery of reality.
vulgar
Because our society are now not distinguish between men and perhaps in good faith, believe they are smart that are fools, they are good ones that are most fakes. You know that there are sick of vision which the objects are gray blue. A similar thing happens to us today to English: a perversion of the trial are suffering on people. Smart judged these vain chatter called "political." It is believed that a good poet, great novelist, a good teacher who says more commonplace, the one that best flatters the public